Article  |   August 2011
Initial Mean Length of Utterance Predicts the Relative Efficacy of Two Grammatical Treatments in Preschoolers With Specific Language Impairment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Paul J. Yoder
    Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
    Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  • Dennis Molfese
    University of Louisville, KY
    University of Louisville, KY
  • Elizabeth Gardner
    Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
    Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  • Correspondence to Paul Yoder: paul.yoder@vanderbilt.edu
  • Editor: Karla McGregor
    Editor: Karla McGregor×
  • Associate Editor: Carol Miller
    Associate Editor: Carol Miller×
Language Disorders / Specific Language Impairment / Language
Article   |   August 2011
Initial Mean Length of Utterance Predicts the Relative Efficacy of Two Grammatical Treatments in Preschoolers With Specific Language Impairment
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2011, Vol.54, 1170-1181. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0246)
History: Accepted 20 Dec 2010 , Received 14 Nov 2009 , Revised 15 Apr 2010
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2011, Vol.54, 1170-1181. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0246)
History: Accepted 20 Dec 2010 , Received 14 Nov 2009 , Revised 15 Apr 2010

Purpose: We sought to confirm predictions based on past findings that pretreatment mean length of utterance (MLU) would predict which of 2 grammatical treatments would best facilitate generalized and maintained grammatical development in preschoolers with specific language impairment (SLI).

Method: The participants were 57 preschoolers with SLI. A randomized group experiment was used. The 2 grammatical treatments were broad target recasts (BTR) and milieu language teaching (MLT). MLU was assessed at Time 1 in 2 conversational language samples. Growth rate of productive grammar was quantified using growth curve modeling on the Index of Productive Syntax (IPSyn) from 2 conversational language samples at each of 6 measurement periods.

Results: Predictions were confirmed for children with initially low MLU but not for children with initially high MLUs. MLT facilitated growth of grammar better than BTR in children who were initially in Brown’s stage I. Effects maintained 5 months after treatment ended.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Working Memory and Specific Language Impairment: An Update on the Relation and Perspectives on Assessment and Treatment
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology February 2010, Vol.19, 78-94. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0028)
The Acquisition of Tense and Agreement Morphemes by Children With Specific Language Impairment During Intervention: Phase 3
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research February 2008, Vol.51, 120-125. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/008)
Intervention for Verb Argument Structure in Children With Persistent SLI: A Randomized Control Trial
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research October 2007, Vol.50, 1330-1349. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/093)
Tense and Agreement Morphemes in the Speech of Children With Specific Language Impairment During Intervention: Phase 2Leonard et al.: Morphological Intervention Phase II
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2006, Vol.49, 749-770. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/054)
Effects of Imitative and Conversational Recasting Treatment on the Acquisition of Grammar in Children With Specific Language Impairment and Younger Language-Normal Children
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 1996, Vol.39, 850-859. doi:10.1044/jshr.3904.850