Article  |   April 2010
The Internal Validity and Acceptability of the Danish SI-3: A Language-Screening Instrument for 3-Year-Olds
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dorthe Bleses
    University of Southern Denmark, Odense
  • Werner Vach
    University of Southern Denmark, Odense
  • Rune N. Jørgensen
    University of Southern Denmark, Odense
  • Torben Worm
    Mikro Værkstedet A/S, Odense, Denmark
  • Contact author: Dorthe Bleses, Center for Child Language, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark. E-mail: bleses@sdu.dk.
Special Populations / Cultural & Linguistic Diversity / Research Issues, Methods & Evidence-Based Practice / Language Disorders / Attention, Memory & Executive Functions / Language
Article   |   April 2010
The Internal Validity and Acceptability of the Danish SI-3: A Language-Screening Instrument for 3-Year-Olds
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2010, Vol.53, 490-507. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0132)
History: Accepted 06 Jul 2009 , Received 04 Jul 2008 , Revised 04 Dec 2008
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2010, Vol.53, 490-507. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0132)
History: Accepted 06 Jul 2009 , Received 04 Jul 2008 , Revised 04 Dec 2008

Purpose: To document the development of a new parent- and day care–administered screening instrument (the Screening Instrument for 3-Year-Olds [SI-3]) to be used in a newly implemented, educationally motivated population language screening in Denmark. The authors investigated whether the basic principles of the SI-3 were working satisfactorily and studied the acceptability of the instrument.

Method: To examine the general properties of the SI-3, 517 children from a population-based sample were screened with the SI-3 instrument, which assesses various receptive and productive language dimensions on the basis of parental checklists and day care staff–administered structured tests. To examine the acceptability of the SI-3, 2 questionnaires were administered and completed by 291 parents and 135 preschool teachers.

Result: We obtained a distribution with sufficient negative skew to differentiate among children with low scores, and the instrument displayed acceptable psychometric properties for most subscales. Results of the acceptability study suggest that the acceptability of the SI-3 is high among parents and day care staff, which supports a high attendance rate.

Conclusion: The SI-3 captures a variety of language skills and is good at differentiating children in the lower end of the tail; it is thereby suitable for population language screening, although results indicated the need for some revision.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Measurement Properties and Classification Accuracy of Two Spanish Parent Surveys of Language Development for Preschool-Age Children
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology August 2010, Vol.19, 225-237. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0058)
Classification Accuracy of Brief Parent Report Measures of Language Development in Spanish-Speaking Toddlers
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools October 2011, Vol.42, 536-549. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0076)
Developmental Trajectories of Early Communication Skills
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2012, Vol.55, 1083-1096. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0305)
Evaluating Families' Satisfaction With Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Services in Massachusetts
American Journal of Audiology June 2007, Vol.16, 29-56. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2007/004)
Parents as Communication Partners: An Evidence-Based Strategy for Improving Parent Support for Language and Communication in Everyday Settings
SIG 1 Perspectives on Language Learning and Education August 2013, Vol.20, 96-111. doi:10.1044/lle20.3.96