Use of the Language Development Survey (LDS) in a National Probability Sample of Children 18 to 35 Months Old Data are reported from a national probability sample used to norm the Language Development Survey (LDS; L. Rescorla, 1989) and the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1 1/2–5 (CBCL/1 1/2–5; T. M. Achenbach & L. Rescorla, 2000). Participants were 278 children 18 to 35 months old who were highly diverse ... Research Article
Research Article  |   August 01, 2002
Use of the Language Development Survey (LDS) in a National Probability Sample of Children 18 to 35 Months Old
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Leslie Rescorla, PhD
    Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr, PA
  • Thomas M. Achenbach
    University of Vermont Burlington
  • Contact author: Leslie Rescorla, PhD, Department of Psychology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010. E-mail: lrescorl@brynmawr.edu
Article Information
Development / Special Populations / Cultural & Linguistic Diversity / Language Disorders / Speech, Voice & Prosody / Language / Research Articles
Research Article   |   August 01, 2002
Use of the Language Development Survey (LDS) in a National Probability Sample of Children 18 to 35 Months Old
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, August 2002, Vol. 45, 733-743. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/059)
History: Received July 9, 2001 , Accepted March 19, 2002
 
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, August 2002, Vol. 45, 733-743. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/059)
History: Received July 9, 2001; Accepted March 19, 2002
Web of Science® Times Cited: 68

Data are reported from a national probability sample used to norm the Language Development Survey (LDS; L. Rescorla, 1989) and the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1 1/2–5 (CBCL/1 1/2–5; T. M. Achenbach & L. Rescorla, 2000). Participants were 278 children 18 to 35 months old who were highly diverse in socioeconomic status (SES), ethnic composition, and language background. Vocabulary scores increased markedly with age, were somewhat higher in girls, and were modestly correlated with SES. Children of non-Latino White ethnicity had significantly higher vocabulary scores and mean length of phrases than children of African American or ‘other’ ethnicity (Hispanics/Asians/Native Americans/ South Asians/mixed), even when SES was used as a covariate. Rate of language delay, using the cut-off of fewer than 50 words or no word combinations, was lower in the non-Latino White group (4%) than in the other two ethnicity groups (29% and 24%). Correlations between LDS scores and problem scores on the CBCL/1 1/2–5 were low, indicating that language delay and emotional/behavior problems were not closely associated in this general population sample of children 18 to 35 months old.

Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families of the University of Vermont. The authors wish to thank the parents whose participation made this research possible.
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access