Article/Report  |   April 1999
Neural Networks Applied to Retrocochlear Diagnosis
Author Notes
Hearing & Speech Perception / Hearing Disorders / Hearing
Article/Report   |   April 1999
Neural Networks Applied to Retrocochlear Diagnosis
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 1999, Vol.42, 287-299. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.287
History: Accepted 30 Oct 1998 , Received 17 Apr 1998
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 1999, Vol.42, 287-299. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.287
History: Accepted 30 Oct 1998 , Received 17 Apr 1998

Methodologies have been developed, based on insights from signal detection theory, to evaluate quantitatively the diagnostic performance of tests. Several studies have demonstrated that, in fact, performance of a test battery can be inferior to the best of the tests it includes. These studies have been quite persuasive in damping enthusiasm for the test battery approach. Because the results of all tests in a battery were weighted equally in these studies, it is not surprising that an individual test with good sensitivity and specificity is more effective diagnostically than a combination of tests with poorer sensitivity and specificity. The authors of many of these studies were well aware of the limitations of this approach. In the present study, neural networks were applied to evaluate audiological tests used to predict retrocochlear pathology by differentially weighting the results of the tests in the battery. This technique avoids some of the limitations of previous approaches. Of the audiological tests evaluated in the present analysis, the superiority of the auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR) in predicting retrocochlear disease was again demonstrated. However, the results also demonstrated that identification accuracy could be improved by combining the ABR with other tests (in this case contralateral acoustic reflex at 2000 Hz, ipsilateral acoustic reflex at 2000 Hz, tone decay, and word recognition score). Further, it was demonstrated that performance could be improved over that obtained using dichotomous test measures (i.e., positive or negative presence of pathology) by using raw test measures in conjunction with ABR.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Early Hearing Detection and Intervention: Diagnostic Hearing Assessment Practices
American Journal of Audiology December 2011, Vol.20, 123-131. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0046)
Response to Sauter (2007)
American Journal of Audiology June 2007, Vol.16, 77-78. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2007/008)
Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Auditory Processing Disorder
American Journal of Audiology June 2011, Vol.20, 48-60. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0019)
Sensitivity and Specificity of French Language and Processing Measures for the Identification of Primary Language Impairment at Age 5
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2011, Vol.54, 580-597. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0196)
ABR Indices
American Journal of Audiology March 1996, Vol.5, 97-104. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0501.97