Article/Report  |   June 2001
Training Volunteers as Conversation Partners Using "Supported Conversation for Adults With Aphasia" (SCA)
 
Author Notes
  • Corresponding author: e-mail: akagan@aphasia.ca
  • ¬©American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Article Information
Normal Language Processing / Language Disorders / Aphasia / Language
Article/Report   |   June 2001
Training Volunteers as Conversation Partners Using "Supported Conversation for Adults With Aphasia" (SCA)
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, June 2001, Vol. 44, 624-638. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/051)
History: Received August 24, 2000 , Accepted January 19, 2001
 
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, June 2001, Vol. 44, 624-638. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/051)
History: Received August 24, 2000; Accepted January 19, 2001
Web of Science® Times Cited: 122

This article reports the development and evaluation of a new intervention termed "Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia" (SCA). The approach is based on the idea that the inherent competence of people with aphasia can be revealed through the skill of a conversation partner. The intervention approach was developed at a community-based aphasia center where volunteers interact with individuals with chronic aphasia and their families. The experimental study was designed to test whether training improves the conversational skills of volunteers, and, if so, whether the improvements affect the communication of their conversation partners with aphasia. Twenty volunteers received SCA training, and 20 control volunteers were merely exposed to people with aphasia. Comparisons between the groups' scores on a Measure of Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia provide support for the efficacy of SCA. Trained volunteers scored significantly higher than untrained volunteers on ratings of acknowledging competence [F (1, 36)=19.1, p < .001] and revealing competence [F(1, 36)=159.0, p < .001] of their partners with aphasia. The training also produced a positive change in ratings of social [F(1, 36)=5.7, p < .023] and message exchange skills [F(1, 36)=17.6, p < .001] of individuals with aphasia, even though these individuals did not participate in the training. Implications for the treatment of aphasia and an argument for a social model of intervention are discussed.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access