Response to Cannito I appreciate Cannito’s insightful examination of my study and am in agreement with him on all points. This particular manuscript was subjected to a rather thorough review (there were three resubmissions) and the manuscript examined by the staff at Kay Elemetrics for accuracy. I feel the care with it ... Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor  |   December 01, 1992
Response to Cannito
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • James L. Fitch
    Auburn University
Article Information
Speech, Voice & Prosody / Speech / Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor   |   December 01, 1992
Response to Cannito
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, December 1992, Vol. 35, 1269. doi:10.1044/jshr.3506.1269a
History: Received November 26, 1991 , Accepted April 28, 1992
 
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, December 1992, Vol. 35, 1269. doi:10.1044/jshr.3506.1269a
History: Received November 26, 1991; Accepted April 28, 1992
I appreciate Cannito’s insightful examination of my study and am in agreement with him on all points. This particular manuscript was subjected to a rather thorough review (there were three resubmissions) and the manuscript examined by the staff at Kay Elemetrics for accuracy. I feel the care with it was reviewed was warranted, realizing that the Visi-Pitch is a widely used instrument.
The original title was “The Reliability and Consistency of Fundamental Frequency and Perturbation Measurement in Vowel Production, Reading and Spontaneous Speech.” The title change was recommended by the reviewers. I understood the reviewers’ concerns and concurred with them. The final use of the terms “consistency” and “reliability” in the manuscript were at the suggestion of the reviewers.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access