Parameters of Auditory Feedback Adult speakers participated in three feedback conditions: Lombard, sidetone amplification, and delayed auditory feedback (DAF). All the procedures affected vocal intensity significantly, but only DAF caused changes in syllable rate. The three conditions did not provide equivalent data. Performance on any one of the feedback procedures was not predictive of ... Research Note
Research Note  |   September 01, 1982
Parameters of Auditory Feedback
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Gerald M. Siegel
    University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • Edward J. Schork, Jr.
    University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • Herbert L. Pick, Jr.
    University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  • Sharon R. Garber
    University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Article Information
Research Notes
Research Note   |   September 01, 1982
Parameters of Auditory Feedback
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, September 1982, Vol. 25, 473-475. doi:10.1044/jshr.2503.473
History: Received January 16, 1981 , Accepted September 11, 1981
 
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, September 1982, Vol. 25, 473-475. doi:10.1044/jshr.2503.473
History: Received January 16, 1981; Accepted September 11, 1981

Adult speakers participated in three feedback conditions: Lombard, sidetone amplification, and delayed auditory feedback (DAF). All the procedures affected vocal intensity significantly, but only DAF caused changes in syllable rate. The three conditions did not provide equivalent data. Performance on any one of the feedback procedures was not predictive of performance on the others. Generalizations concerning auditory feedback must, therefore, take account of the particular method used and the parameter of speech studied.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access