Article/Report  |   December 2007
Analysis and Control in Children With SLI
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jarrad A. G. Lum
    Deakin University
  • Edith L. Bavin
    La Trobe University
  • Contact author: Jarrad A. G. Lum, Lecturer in Psychology, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217 Australia. E-mail: jarrad.lum@deakin.edu.au.
Language Disorders / Specific Language Impairment / Language
Article/Report   |   December 2007
Analysis and Control in Children With SLI
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2007, Vol.50, 1618-1630. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/109)
History: Accepted 30 May 2007 , Received 08 Sep 2004 , Revised 04 Apr 2005
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2007, Vol.50, 1618-1630. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/109)
History: Accepted 30 May 2007 , Received 08 Sep 2004 , Revised 04 Apr 2005

Purpose: E. Bialystok and E. B. Ryan (1985)  have outlined two operations, analysis and control, which are required for grammaticality judgments. In this model, analysis is involved in determining the grammaticality of a sentence, and control is required so that irrelevant information is ignored. This study examined these processes in specific language impairment (SLI).

Method: Sixteen children with SLI and 20 typically developing (TD) children between 8;6 (years;months) and 10;6 were presented with a grammatical judgment task. Analysis was measured by recording children’s decision times in determining grammaticality. Control was assessed by examining accuracy for judgments made for semantically odd sentences.

Results: Relative to the TD group, it was found that the children with SLI took longer in judging sentences associated with the process of analysis. Children with SLI were also found to have more difficulty, in terms of accuracy, with items requiring control (e.g., semantically odd sentences) than did the TD group.

Conclusion: It is argued that the longer time required for children with SLI to respond to semantically normal sentences reflects a degree of difficulty with completing analysis. The SLI group’s lower level of accuracy on semantically odd sentences reflects a problem with a control and is consistent with previously reported problems with cognitive inhibition in SLI.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

The Use and Productivity of Past Tense Morphology in Specific Language Impairment: An Examination of Danish
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2012, Vol.55, 1671-1689. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0350)
Factors Affecting Accuracy of Past Tense Production in Children With Specific Language Impairment And Their Typically Developing Peers: The Influence of Verb Transitivity, Clause Location, and Sentence Type
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2010, Vol.53, 993-1014. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0039)
Effects of Acoustic Manipulation on the Real-Time Inflectional Processing of Children With Specific Language Impairment
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2006, Vol.49, 1238-1256. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/089)
Identification of Clinical Markers of Specific Language Impairment in Adults
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2010, Vol.53, 414-429. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0016)
Sentence Comprehension in Specific Language Impairment: A Task Designed to Distinguish Between Cognitive Capacity and Syntactic Complexity
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2013, Vol.56, 577-589. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0254)