The Effect of Psychophysical Method on the Loudness of Continuous and Interrupted Pure Tones Using the Bekesy tracking method for loudness judgment tasks such as most comfortable loudness (MCL) and recalled loudness (RL) measurements, normal listeners have tracked continuous (C) tones at lesser intensities than interrupted (I) tones. The resulting continuous/interrupted (C/I) separations have ranged up to 22 dB. Explanations of the unexpected C/I ... Research Article
Research Article  |   December 01, 1979
The Effect of Psychophysical Method on the Loudness of Continuous and Interrupted Pure Tones
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dennis Hampton
    Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, New York
  • Ira M. Ventry
    Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York
Article Information
Research Articles
Research Article   |   December 01, 1979
The Effect of Psychophysical Method on the Loudness of Continuous and Interrupted Pure Tones
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, December 1979, Vol. 22, 717-730. doi:10.1044/jshr.2204.717
History: Received May 17, 1978 , Accepted December 18, 1978
 
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, December 1979, Vol. 22, 717-730. doi:10.1044/jshr.2204.717
History: Received May 17, 1978; Accepted December 18, 1978

Using the Bekesy tracking method for loudness judgment tasks such as most comfortable loudness (MCL) and recalled loudness (RL) measurements, normal listeners have tracked continuous (C) tones at lesser intensities than interrupted (I) tones. The resulting continuous/interrupted (C/I) separations have ranged up to 22 dB. Explanations of the unexpected C/I separations have not been in agreement. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether psychophysical method has a significant effect on the C/I separation. Subjects were six normal-hearing adults, each of whom participated in three practice and ten test sessions of one hour each. Thirty-six experimental conditions were presented. The test signals were C tones, 200/200 msec I tones and 200/800 msec I tones, all at 1 kHz. The reference intensities were 20, 50 and 80 dB SPL. The four methods were Bekesy tracking method (BTM), method of adjustment (MAdj), method of limits (ML) and method of constant stimuli difference (MCSD). Mean values for Point of Subjective Equality and C/I separation were calculated. C/I separations obtained with the BTM were significantly larger than C/I separations obtained with any other psychophysical method. These results demonstrate that C/I separations obtained during suprathreshold Bekesy tracking tasks by normal hearers are largely caused by the measurement method itself rather than by differences in C and I tone loudness. Time order errors could explain the BTM effect.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access