Erratum In the December 1965 issue of this journal, a printing error occurred on page 377 of Donald C. Teas' article, “Analysis of Evoked and Ongoing Electrical Activity at the Scalp of Human Subects.” The first two sentences under General Findings should have read: The agreement between the two electrode placements ... Erratum
Erratum  |   March 01, 1966
Erratum
 
Author Notes
Article Information
Erratum
Erratum   |   March 01, 1966
Erratum
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, March 1966, Vol. 9, 160. doi:10.1044/jshr.0901.160
 
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, March 1966, Vol. 9, 160. doi:10.1044/jshr.0901.160

In the December 1965 issue of this journal, a printing error occurred on page 377 of Donald C. Teas' article, “Analysis of Evoked and Ongoing Electrical Activity at the Scalp of Human Subects.” The first two sentences under General Findings should have read:

The agreement between the two electrode placements for sources of significant variation was greater for the average responses than for the low-frequency background activity. For the average responses, four out of five significant effects occurred for the same sources of variation.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access