Article/Report  |   August 2006
Mean Length of Utterance in Children With Specific Language Impairment and in Younger Control Children Shows Concurrent Validity and Stable and Parallel Growth TrajectoriesRice et al.: MLU Holds Up Over Time
Author Notes
  • Contact author: Mabel L. Rice, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, 3031 Dole Center, Child Language Doctoral Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045. E-mail: mabel@ku.edu
  • Lesa Hoffman is now at University of Nebraska—Lincoln.
    Lesa Hoffman is now at University of Nebraska—Lincoln.×
Language Disorders / Specific Language Impairment / Language
Article/Report   |   August 2006
Mean Length of Utterance in Children With Specific Language Impairment and in Younger Control Children Shows Concurrent Validity and Stable and Parallel Growth TrajectoriesRice et al.: MLU Holds Up Over Time
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2006, Vol.49, 793-808. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/056)
History: Accepted 06 Dec 2005 , Received 28 Feb 2005 , Revised 04 Sep 2005
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2006, Vol.49, 793-808. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/056)
History: Accepted 06 Dec 2005 , Received 28 Feb 2005 , Revised 04 Sep 2005

Purpose: Although mean length of utterance (MLU) is a useful benchmark in studies of children with specific language impairment (SLI), some empirical and interpretive issues are unresolved. The authors report on 2 studies examining, respectively, the concurrent validity and temporal stability of MLU equivalency between children with SLI and typically developing children.

Method: Study 1 used 124 archival conversational samples consisting of 39 children with SLI (age 5;0 [years;months]), 40 MLU-equivalent typically developing children (age 3;0), and 45 age-equivalent controls. Concurrent validity of MLU matches was examined by considering the correspondence between MLU and developmental sentence scoring (DSS), index of productive syntax (IPSyn), and MLU in words. Study 2 used 205 archival conversational samples, representing 5 years of longitudinal data collected on 20 children with SLI (from age 5;0) and 18 MLU matches (from age 3;0). Evaluation of growth dimensions within and across groups was carried out via growth-curve modeling.

Results: In Study 1, high levels of correlation among the MLU, DSS, and IPSyn measures were observed. Differences between groups were not significant. In Study 2, temporal stability of MLU matches was robust over a 5 year period.

Conclusions: MLU appears to be a reliable and valid index of general language development and an appropriate grouping variable from age 3 to 10. The developmental stability of MLU matches is indicative of shared underlying growth mechanisms.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Concurrent and Construct Validity of Oral Language Measures With School-Age Children With Specific Language Impairment
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2011, Vol.54, 1597-1608. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0213)
The Diagnostic Accuracy and Construct Validity of the Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test—Preschool: Second Edition
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools April 2009, Vol.40, 150-160. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/07-0049)
Factors Influencing the Selection of Standardized Tests for the Diagnosis of Specific Language Impairment
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools April 2013, Vol.44, 133-146. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2012/12-0093)
The Diagnostic and Predictive Validity of The Renfrew Bus Story
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools October 2007, Vol.38, 390-399. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2007/040)
Finiteness Marking in Boys With Fragile X Syndrome
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2012, Vol.55, 1704-1715. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0106)