Article/Report  |   April 2006
Effect of Facemask Use on Respiratory Patterns of Women in Speech and Singing
 
Author Notes
  • Contact author: Sally Collyer, who is now at Suite 2, 17 Carrington Road, Box Hill Victoria 3128, Australia Email: sallycollyer@yahoo.com.au
  • Sally Collyer is now a private singing teacher, Melbourne. Australia
    Sally Collyer is now a private singing teacher, Melbourne. Australia×
  • Pamela J. Davis is now affiliated with the School of Communicaton Sciences, La Trobe University, Australia.
    Pamela J. Davis is now affiliated with the School of Communicaton Sciences, La Trobe University, Australia.×
Article Information
Speech, Voice & Prosody / Speech
Article/Report   |   April 2006
Effect of Facemask Use on Respiratory Patterns of Women in Speech and Singing
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, April 2006, Vol. 49, 412-423. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/032)
History: Received December 5, 2004 , Revised May 3, 2005 , Accepted September 1, 2005
 
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, April 2006, Vol. 49, 412-423. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/032)
History: Received December 5, 2004; Revised May 3, 2005; Accepted September 1, 2005
Web of Science® Times Cited: 3

Purpose: Research into respiratory behavior during singing and speech makes extensive use of standard respiratory and vented pneumotachograph facemasks. This study investigated whether the use of such facemasks would affect respiratory behavior in terms of lung volume (excursion, at initiation and at termination) or duration (of inspiration and of expiration) during speech or singing.

Method: The respiratory patterns of 6 females were recorded using uniaxial surface magnetometry during 4 tasks: quiet breathing, a /pa/ syllabic train, reading (“The Rainbow Passage”), and singing a Christmas carol (“Silent night”). Each task was performed in 4 facemask conditions: wearing no facemask, wearing a facemask rim only, wearing a standard respiratory facemask, and wearing a vented pneumotachograph facemask.

Results: No significant effect was found for any of the facemask conditions on lung volume or duration measures during any tasks.

Conclusion: The results confirm earlier studies that the vented pneumotachograph facemask does not affect breathing behavior in speech research studies and extends the finding to the study of breathing behavior in singing and to the use of a standard respiratory facemask.

Acknowledgments
The findings of this paper were presented as a poster at the Sixth Voice Symposium of Australia, held in October 2002 in Glenelg, South Australia. We thank the individuals in the study for their participation.
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access