Article/Report  |   April 2006
Speech Perception in Individuals With Auditory Neuropathy
Author Notes
  • Contact author: Fan-Gang Zeng, 364 Med Surge II, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. Email: fzeng@uci.edu
Hearing & Speech Perception / Acoustics / Hearing Disorders / Hearing Aids, Cochlear Implants & Assistive Technology / Swallowing, Dysphagia & Feeding Disorders / Hearing
Article/Report   |   April 2006
Speech Perception in Individuals With Auditory Neuropathy
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2006, Vol.49, 367-380. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/029)
History: Accepted 20 Sep 2005 , Received 17 Dec 2004
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2006, Vol.49, 367-380. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/029)
History: Accepted 20 Sep 2005 , Received 17 Dec 2004

Purpose: Speech perception in participants with auditory neuropathy (AN) was systematically studied to answer the following 2 questions: Does noise present a particular problem for people with AN? Can clear speech and cochlear implants alleviate this problem?

Method: The researchers evaluated the advantage in intelligibility of clear speech over conversational speech in 13 participants with AN. Of these participants, 7 had received a cochlear implant. Eight sentence-recognition experiments were conducted to examine the clear speech advantage in 2 listening conditions (quiet and noise) using 4 stimulation modes (monaural acoustic, diotic acoustic, monaural electric, and binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation).

Results: Participants with AN performed more poorly in speech recognition in noise than did the normal-hearing, cochlear-impaired, and cochlear implant controls. A significant clear speech advantage was observed, ranging from 9 to 23 percentage points in intelligibility for all listening conditions and stimulation modes. Electric stimulation via a cochlear implant produced significantly higher intelligibility than acoustic stimulation in both quiet and in noise. Binaural hearing with either diotic acoustic stimulation or combined acoustic and electric stimulation produced significantly higher intelligibility than monaural stimulation in quiet but not in noise.

Conclusions: Participants with AN most likely derive the clear speech advantage from enhanced temporal properties in clear speech and improved neural synchrony with electric stimulation. Although the present result supports cochlear implantation as one treatment choice for people with AN, it suggests that the use of innovative hearing aids may be another viable option to improve speech perception in noise.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

The Effect of Technology and Testing Environment on Speech Perception Using Telehealth With Cochlear Implant Recipients
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research October 2012, Vol.55, 1373-1386. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0358)
Acoustic and Semantic Enhancements for Children With Cochlear Implants
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2013, Vol.56, 1085-1096. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0097)
Speech Recognition and Acoustic Features in Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research February 2012, Vol.55, 105-124. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0325)
Ear Asymmetries and Asymmetric Directional Microphone Hearing Aid Fittings
American Journal of Audiology December 2011, Vol.20, 111-122. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0035)
Binaural Advantage for Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2008, Vol.51, 539-556. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/039)