Article/Report  |   April 2006
Can Severely Language Delayed 3-Year-Olds Be Identified at 18 Months? Evaluation of a Screening Version of the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories
Author Notes
  • Contact author: Monica Westerlund, Central Unit of Child Health Care, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Unit of Pediatrics, Uppsala University Hospital S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: monica.westerlund@akademiska.se
Special Populations / Cultural & Linguistic Diversity / Language Disorders / Language
Article/Report   |   April 2006
Can Severely Language Delayed 3-Year-Olds Be Identified at 18 Months? Evaluation of a Screening Version of the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2006, Vol.49, 237-247. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/020)
History: Accepted 17 Aug 2005 , Received 17 Apr 2004 , Revised 22 Oct 2004
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2006, Vol.49, 237-247. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/020)
History: Accepted 17 Aug 2005 , Received 17 Apr 2004 , Revised 22 Oct 2004

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a screening instrument (the Swedish Communication Screening at 18 months of age; SCS18), derived from the Swedish MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventory, in identification of 18-month-old children who will be severely language disabled by 3 years of age, the authors (a) analyzed which SCS18’s component yielded the best prediction, (b) compared the productivity figures of the SCS18 with those of the traditional method of identification, and (c) tried different cutoff criteria of the SCS18.

Method: Half of the child health care (CHC) centers in a Swedish county were randomly selected to use the SCS18 (e.g., a checklist supporting parents in assessing their child’s word production, word comprehension, and communicative gestures). Remaining CHC centers used an informal assessment. Expressive and receptive language was subsequently judged with an observation for 3-year-olds that is routine in the county. An unselected population of 2,080 children participated at 18 months of age and again at 3 years of age.

Result: Number of spoken words yielded the best prediction, and SCS18 was superior to the traditional method. A sensitivity of 50%, however, was not enough, and a stricter criterion resulted in too many false positives to be acceptable as routine.

Conclusion: Although the SCS18 has strength, the age of 18 months seems to be too early for identification of severe language disability.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

On the Sensitivity and Specificity of Nonword Repetition and Sentence Recall to Language and Memory Impairments in Children
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research August 2009, Vol.52, 899-914. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0099)
Validity of the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories for Measuring Language Abilities in Children With Cochlear Implants
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology February 2007, Vol.16, 54-64. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/007)
A Screening Version of the Swedish Communicative Development Inventories Designed for Use With 18-Month-Old Children
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research October 2002, Vol.45, 948-960. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/077)
Predicting Outcomes of Children Referred for Autism Using the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventory
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research June 2007, Vol.50, 667-681. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/047)
Coordinator’s Column
SIG 14 Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Populations October 2011, Vol.18, 55-56. doi:10.1044/cds18.3.55