Article/Report  |   December 2006
Differentiating Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density in Adult Word Learning
Author Notes
  • Contact author: Holly Storkel, Department of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences and Disorders, University of Kansas, 3001 Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045-7555. E-mail: hstorkel@ku.edu.
  • Tiffany P. Hogan is now at Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson.
    Tiffany P. Hogan is now at Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson.×
Development / Attention, Memory & Executive Functions / Speech, Voice & Prosody / Language
Article/Report   |   December 2006
Differentiating Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density in Adult Word Learning
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2006, Vol.49, 1175-1192. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085)
History: Accepted 05 Mar 2006 , Received 29 Jul 2005 , Revised 03 Jan 2006
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research December 2006, Vol.49, 1175-1192. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085)
History: Accepted 05 Mar 2006 , Received 29 Jul 2005 , Revised 03 Jan 2006

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to differentiate effects of phonotactic probability, the likelihood of occurrence of a sound sequence, and neighborhood density, the number of words that sound similar to a given word, on adult word learning. A second purpose was to determine what aspect of word learning (viz., triggering learning, formation of an initial representation, or integration with existing representations) was influenced by each variable.

Method: Thirty-two adults were exposed to 16 nonwords paired with novel objects in a story context. The nonwords orthogonally varied in phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Learning was measured following 1, 4, and 7 exposures in a picture-naming task. Partially correct (i.e., 2 of 3 phonemes correct) and completely correct responses (i.e., 3 of 3 phonemes correct) were analyzed together and independently to examine emerging and partial representations of new words versus complete and accurate representations of new words.

Results: Analysis of partially correct and completely correct responses combined showed that adults learned a lower proportion of high-probability nonwords than low-probability nonwords (i.e., high-probability disadvantage) and learned a higher proportion of high-density nonwords than low-density nonwords (i.e., high-density advantage). Separate analysis of partially correct responses yielded an effect of phonotactic probability only, whereas analysis of completely correct responses yielded an effect of neighborhood density only.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that phonological and lexical processing influence different aspects of word learning. In particular, phonotactic probability may aid in triggering new learning, whereas neighborhood density may influence the integration of new lexical representations with existing representations.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

On-line learning from input versus off-line memory evolution in adult word learning: Effects of neighborhood density and phonologically-related practice
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research March 2014, Vol., No Pagination Specified. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0150
Effect of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Word Learning Configuration by Preschoolers with Typical Development and Specific Language Impairment
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research February 2014, Vol., No Pagination Specified. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-12-0282
The Effect of Incremental Changes in Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Word Learning by Preschool Children
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research October 2013, Vol.56, 1689-1700. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0245)
Word Learning in Adults With Second-Language Experience: Effects of Phonological and Referent Familiarity
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research April 2013, Vol.56, 667-678. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0084)
The Role of Selected Lexical Factors on Confrontation Naming Accuracy, Speed, and Fluency in Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research February 2007, Vol.50, 196-213. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/016)