Comparison of Graphic and Computer Averaging Method of EER The graphic binary addition technique for detection of evoked responses reported in a recent paper (Shimizu, 1966) was reevaluated by comparing results obtained by the graphic method with those from the electronic average response computer. The study revealed good agreement in the results obtained by the two methods, and indicated ... Research Article
Research Article  |   June 01, 1967
Comparison of Graphic and Computer Averaging Method of EER
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hiroshi Shimizu
    The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Robert N. Glackin
    The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Article Information
Research Articles
Research Article   |   June 01, 1967
Comparison of Graphic and Computer Averaging Method of EER
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, June 1967, Vol. 10, 373-376. doi:10.1044/jshr.1002.373
 
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, June 1967, Vol. 10, 373-376. doi:10.1044/jshr.1002.373

The graphic binary addition technique for detection of evoked responses reported in a recent paper (Shimizu, 1966) was reevaluated by comparing results obtained by the graphic method with those from the electronic average response computer. The study revealed good agreement in the results obtained by the two methods, and indicated efficiency of the graphic method in conventional EEG audiometry.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access